According to a source with direct knowledge of the figure, the amount of revenue-sharing that funneled from the haves to the have-nots in MLB this year was approx. $400 million. While the money is not distributed evenly across the clubs, if the 15 lowest revenue-makers were given an equal portion it would equal approx. $27 million per each of those clubs.It's worth pointing out again that revenue sharing isn't the product of teams with new stadiums subsidizing teams without them; it's the product of MLB letting large-market teams spend extravagantly on free agents.
The amount of revenue-sharing in Major League Baseball should stymie any talk that clubs can’t—at the very least—be able to compete selectively in the free agency space from time to time. It also affords club opportunity to wrap up talent on their rosters to avoid them leaving once they hit free agency. While it’s clear that the amount of revenue-sharing they received this year is not enough to cover the entire amount, the Rays likely covered a lot of the annual salary increase needed to ink Evan Longoria to his $100 million extension with revenue-sharing proceeds. That’s the purpose of revenue-sharing.
Finally, there's this to consider. With the skyrocketing growth of regional sports network revenues, plus the continued robust nature of baseball as an entertainment option, it seems that in the very near future we'll see revenue-sharing in MLB surpass a half-a-billion dollars. With it, let's hope clubs are using the gifted money from their large revenue-making brethren wisely.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Biz of Baseball: Rays Got at Least $27M in Revenue Sharing in 2012
While MLB hasn't publicized how much individual teams received from revenue-sharing last year, the Biz of Baseball reports today the Tampa Bay Rays likely received
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment