Sunday, December 29, 2013

Dan Ruth on Hagan's BCS Jobs Claim

As if Deadspin, Shadow of the Stadium, and Politifact weren't enough, Pulitzer-winning columnist Dan Ruth was the latest to pile it on Hillsborough Commissioner Ken Hagan this weekend for some unrealistic job claims associated with the 2017 BCS Championship game, now set for Tampa {link to Times' site}:
In his excitement over attracting the championship game, Hagan claimed the clash of titans would generate roughly 2,000 jobs and pave the streets of Tampa in gold. The commissioner based his assertion on a couple of articles he admitted he had only "skimmed" attesting to the pile-driving economic engine a college title contest could visit upon a city.

Of course, such estimates are complete phooey.
...
And yet, despite a solid and growing amount of data to the contrary, public officials like Hagan persist in inaccurately claiming a Super Bowl or a college football championship game will generate impressive job growth and profits for the host city. Poppycock, but understandable poppycock.
...
After all, you couldn't very well expect a sitting county commissioner to say something like: "Even though the NCAA championship game won't do diddly to our bottom line and even though it might only create a handful of jobs, and not ones with much of a future at that, having the event here will look really swell on television and the catering will be fabulous."

Elected officials are supposed to be all about monetary returns influencing their decisions, not martinis.
The irony is that Hagan's comments appeared in the Times and went largely unchallenged initially.

But Ruth's hard line against sports' economic engine claims contradicts the stance the Times' editorial board seems to take with the Rays, which - if nothing else - attests to the independence columnists enjoy at the paper.

6 comments:

  1. ? Even if the city of Tampa only generates 1 extra dollar, then it's worth it! Though the quotes should be posted from all the business & hotel owners around town. I bet you would hear a more positive & progressive tune, but that would debunk your (NO'ah) ideology...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1) We won't know if the city generates one dollar because we may never truly know how much its spending on the event.

      2) Most of the hotel owners are out-of-state, so those profits don't necessarily stay local. Although the economic impact should at least be better than the RNC's, which had a negative impact on the area: http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/article/331234/250/Study-RNC-was-huge-economic-success-but-retailers-skeptical

      Delete
  2. 1) "we may never truly know", lol, then how can YOU make your negative claims about the positive impact of hosting the 2nd biggest annual sporting event in America will have on the Tampa Bay area???
    2) Just another run-of-the-mill news reporter trying to run on the "negativity sells" platform. Besides, it sounds like for every 1 business that didn't do as well, 2 did great! I'm guessing you never realized that...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you paid better attention to the writing, you'd see I complimented the bid. But events like this are generally "loss-leaders" - cities hope to break even in the end.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So I live in Jacksonville, and spent my New Years night this year in Jax Beach. I couldn't help noticing all the Nebraska & Georgia fans at the bars spending lots of money that wouldn't of been if Jacksonville wasn't hosting the Gator Bowl downtown. Now I know it takes resources to host big events, but your "negative" claim that cities hosting these events aren't worth it is a big reach! Good luck with your conspiracies.

    ReplyDelete