Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Times LOVES Rays Contract Amendment, Still Hates Mayor Foster

As I predicted Monday, the Tampa Bay Times' lead editorial today applauded the proposed amendment to St. Pete's contract with the Rays that would allow the team to explore sites in Hillsborough County for the price of $1.4 million a year.  Of course, it also continued its habit of taking digs at Mayor Bill Foster:
Finally, there is a flicker of hope in the stalemate between St. Petersburg City Hall and the Tampa Bay Rays over a new stadium. City Council member Charlie Gerdes has a reasonable proposal to let the Rays pay the city for permission to look at potential stadium sites in Pinellas and Hillsborough counties. Council members on Thursday should ignore Mayor Bill Foster's objections, demonstrate some leadership and embrace Gerdes' concept.

This is exactly the sort of brainstorming and negotiating that should have taken place years ago. Instead, Foster has been stonewalling, threatening lawsuits and hiding behind the Rays' long-term lease with the city to play in outdated Tropicana Field.

The recent public meetings by the Hillsborough and Pinellas county commissions with Rays owner Stuart Sternberg have been useful. The Tampa Bay Partnership stands ready to help, and so do the Tampa and St. Petersburg chambers of commerce. Now it is up to the more pragmatic members of the St. Petersburg City Council such as Gerdes and Chairman Karl Nurse to convince their colleagues it is time to take concrete action — with or without the mayor.
"Productive" is a very subjective word.  If we trust the Rays were providing unbiased information, it could have been productive, but we know they refused to provide "big-picture" stats on their attendance.  The talks did, however, produce more public officials advocating regionalism on the record.

The Times continues:
The Rays show no interest in remaining in St. Petersburg, and they reasonably want to examine potential stadium sites in both Pinellas and Hillsborough counties.
(Actually, Sternberg's "fish don't go to baseball games" comment indicates they may not have any interest in Pinellas.)
What Foster and some City Council members fail to acknowledge is that refusing to budge from the current lease does not protect St. Petersburg taxpayers. In fact, it weakens the city's position. Every year that goes by is one less year to pay on the stadium bonds, and most of those will be paid off in 2016. Every year that goes by is one less year on the Trop lease, which expires in 2027. Every year that goes by, the Rays' negotiating position is strengthened.

The Rays will not be playing in Tropicana Field in 2027, and they may not be playing in Tampa Bay by then if serious stadium discussions don't begin soon. It will take years to find the best site for a new stadium, figure out how to pay for it and build it. Gerdes has a smart proposal to get that effort started, reduce the city's costs for the Trop in the short term and protect the city's interests in the long term. The mayor and the City Council should support it.
While the amendment may have trouble passing St. Pete's council because of fear of what it could do to the city's legal leverage, there's nothing Mayor Bill Foster can do to stop it if it gets five votes.  Keep checking back here over the next 36 hours for all the important developments.

UPDATE: The Tampa Tribune wrote a similar editorial as well, urging council to approve the amendment "or a variation of it."


  1. LOL, while your occupied with bashing the "Times", the Rays are working behind the scenes drawing up blueprints, hashing out finances, etc. on a ballpark @ Channelside. Thanks for not getting the real story until the Rays really come-out-of-the-closet...

  2. Ah, another goofy post from "Anonymous".
    What's YOUR connection with the newspaper and Rayz?
    BTW - It's "you are or you're", try spell/gramnmer check.

  3. WOW, great insight PJ, the Ray(s) need to put you on there new stadium panel!